Re: [Diversity] Attracting people from under-represented regions into the IETF

Steve Conte <conte@isoc.org> Thu, 10 October 2013 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <conte@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC7D21E8122 for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.874
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.874 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.726, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3HeZMcyv3QWd for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1lp0152.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.152]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DE721E8090 for <diversity@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR06MB019.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.190.148) by BLUPR06MB020.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.190.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.785.10; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:30:00 +0000
Received: from BLUPR06MB019.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.126]) by BLUPR06MB019.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.126]) with mapi id 15.00.0785.001; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:30:00 +0000
From: Steve Conte <conte@isoc.org>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Diversity] Attracting people from under-represented regions into the IETF
Thread-Index: AQHOxRIIcXWItL6W/EKGhqTKeVUOqpnttNaA///3l4A=
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:29:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CE7C23DA.1BD1B%conte@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131010024033.0c6794b8@resistor.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [76.170.168.6]
x-forefront-prvs: 0995196AA2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(479174003)(24454002)(377454003)(377424004)(164054003)(189002)(199002)(51704005)(52604005)(81816001)(47976001)(81542001)(74706001)(50986001)(36756003)(81342001)(74876001)(54316002)(74366001)(56776001)(49866001)(47736001)(56816003)(77096001)(76786001)(59766001)(76796001)(76176001)(69226001)(77982001)(85306002)(80022001)(66066001)(74502001)(83072001)(31966008)(54356001)(47446002)(74662001)(51856001)(53806001)(83322001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(76482001)(4396001)(81686001)(46102001)(80976001)(65816001)(63696002)(79102001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB020; H:BLUPR06MB019.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:76.170.168.6; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <D31FFC47C8BC5043AE753FCC2E335FD7@namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
Cc: "diversity@ietf.org" <diversity@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] Attracting people from under-represented regions into the IETF
X-BeenThere: diversity@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <diversity.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/diversity>
List-Post: <mailto:diversity@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:30:11 -0000

SM,

As the others have stated, thanks for taking the time to look at the ISOC
Fellowship to the IETF programme.  As a 5+ times awardee of the
fellowship, you have the ability to see the value of the programme
directly.

I'm struggling with the title that has been suggested: "Improving the ISOC
Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into
the IETF".

This draft is more about suggesting ways in which ISOC should change the
programme to be more restrictive rather than finding ways to attract more
applicants.  The suggestions in the draft reflect changes in selection
criteria of applicants and the make-up of the selection committee.  These
suggestions speak to increasing the quality of the applicant (which ISOC
is already doing) and not about attracting more people.

As I mentioned in a previous mail, the fellowship programme is only one
piece of the overall ISOC strategy to increase awareness and participation
in the IETF.  By looking only at the granularity of the fellowship
programme, it is missing the other methods in which ISOC works towards
attracting people to participate in the IETF.

Finally, what will be the end result of this draft?  Will the IETF submit
this to ISOC as recommendations for consideration?  There are certainly
some ideas within the draft that would be considered, but in the end, this
is an ISOC programme and final decisions on how it's run remain within
ISOC.

Thanks,

Steve


-----
Steve Conte
Internet Leadership Programme
The Internet Society
conte@isoc.org





On 10/10/13 3:00 AM, "S Moonesamy" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

>Hi Arturo,
>At 10:07 09-10-2013, Arturo Servin wrote:
>>     Shouldn't this draft have a title "Improving the ISOC
>> Fellowship programme to Attracting people from under-represented
>> regions into the IETF"?
>>
>>     I like the draft, but I think it is to tied to the ISOC
>> fellowship to give a clear direction to improve participation of
>> under-represented regions to the IETF in general.
>>
>>     My suggestion is to change the title or re-write it to be more
>>generic.
>
>I'll follow your suggestion and rewrite the title as:
>
>   "Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from
>    under-represented regions into the IETF"
>
>I'll post the draft to ietf@ietf.org.  If there isn't consensus on
>that mailing list it is unlikely that the suggestions in the draft
>will be accepted within the IETF.  If anyone has concerns about what
>is in the draft I suggest raising them on the ietf@ietf.org mailing list.
>
>Regards,
>S. Moonesamy 
>
>_______________________________________________
>diversity mailing list
>diversity@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity